Re: Problem with __start_SECNAME symbol generated by GNU linker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Martin Ünsal <martinunsal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have a bug which appears to be GNU toolchain related. I reported
> this bug to LTTng mailing list here:
>
> http://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/2014-April/022950.html
>
> The root cause appears to be a change in the way the GNU linker treats
> the __start_SECNAME symbol, which occured between 4.6.4 and 4.7.2. The
> only documentation for this feature that I was able to find was on
> gcc-help mailing list:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2010-04/msg00113.html
>
> I have some questions:
>
> 1) Is __start_SECNAME feature documented in more detail anywhere?
> 2) Why did the __start_SECNAME symbol move from local to global scope
> between 4.6.4 and 4.7.2?
>
> Any other insight into this issue would be very helpful.

This is implemented by the GNU linker, which is part of the GNU
binutils, not GCC.  You should send a note to the mailing list
binutils@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx .  See http://sourceware.org/binutils/ .

Ian





[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux