On 31 March 2014 13:59, Bdot wrote: > > Happened to me after I switched from gcc (-> gcc-4.8) to gcc-4.9, without > switching the linker to 4.9. The linker is not part of GCC, it's part of binutils, so there is no 4.8 linker or 4.9 linker, so it's not clear what you mean by "switching the linker to 4.9"
