Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: RaJ M <smrajagopal@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:03:18 +0100
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CADi59x3Yz1oh6pwYKfiRZoMgigVLvy=ZjVU-W1mm1zacY+Y_KQ@mail.gmail.com>

GCC supports it because it is valid C++, but see
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition
for details of when a definition is needed.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
  - From: RaJ M

References:
- static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
  - From: RaJ M

Prev by Date: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
Next by Date: Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
Previous by thread: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
Next by thread: Re: static-const-integral in-class-init without explicit definition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux