Re: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Regan, Brian (EPC COE)" <brian.regan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:46:40 +0100
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Cc: "gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <61F2AE955326E042B27D898DD66AE04B33F0E884@DE08EX3006.global.ds.honeywell.com>

On 28 May 2014 19:43, Regan, Brian (EPC COE) wrote:
> Which ANSI section does that violate?

Erm, which does the single-precision floating point comparison violate?

Please read 5.1.2.3 carefully.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
  - From: Regan, Brian (EPC COE)

References:
- Re: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
  - From: Regan, Brian (EPC COE)
- RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
  - From: Marc Glisse
- RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
  - From: Regan, Brian (EPC COE)

Prev by Date: Re: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
Next by Date: RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
Previous by thread: RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
Next by thread: RE: help understanding behaviour of unsuffixed float constants
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux