Linux IDE Archive
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] libata: Setup nbytes in ata_sg_init_one
- Re: Gigabyte i-Ram cards
- Re: [PATCH] libata: do not ignore PIO-only devices
- [PATCH] ahci: add softreset
- [PATCH] libata: do not ignore PIO-only devices
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: Gigabyte i-Ram cards
- Re: Gigabyte i-Ram cards
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: drivers/scsi/sata_vsc.c: inconsistent NULL checking
- libata ignores non-dma disks?
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: [PATCH 07/15] libata: Remove dependence on host_set->dev for SAS
- Re: [PATCH 02/15] libata: Add some dummy noop functions
- Re: [PATCH 06/15] libata: Stop using host->max_cmd_len
- Re: [PATCH 05/15] libata: Add __ata_scsi_ioctl
- Re: [PATCH 04/15] libata: ata_scsi_queuecmd cleanup
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] libata: Setup nbytes in ata_sg_init_one
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: Remove ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: add flush task to ata_exec_internal()
- Re: libata SCSI page 0x83 query
- Re: Gigabyte i-Ram cards
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- [PATCH] Fix IDE DMA resource managment
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- sata_sil did not like multiple LUNs...
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: sata_promise does not see hardware RAID arrays on Fasttrak TX4000
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: sata_promise does not see hardware RAID arrays on Fasttrak TX4000
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] libata-dev: handle ERR=1 DRQ=1
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] libata-dev: handle ERR=1 DRQ=1
- Re: [git patches] libata updates
- Re: [git patches] libata updates
- Re: [PATCH] AHCI SATA vendor update from VIA
- Re: Resume problems on Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO M7440G -- SATA
- From: martin schneebacher
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: Resume problems on Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO M7440G -- SATA
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: sata_Re: sata_mv success on 2.6.16-rc6-mm2
- Re: [PATCH][INCOMPLETE] sata_nv: merge ADMA support
- Marvell SATA Support ... problem
- From: Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- [PATCH/RFC] libata-dev: handle ERR=1 DRQ=1
- Re: [PATCH] AHCI SATA vendor update from VIA
- Re: sata_Re: sata_mv success on 2.6.16-rc6-mm2
- Re: sata_Re: sata_mv success on 2.6.16-rc6-mm2
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask
- Re: [git patches] libata updates
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: Gigabyte i-Ram cards
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- Gigabyte i-Ram cards
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: make ata_set_mode() responsible for failure handling
- Re: [PATCH] AHCI SATA vendor update from VIA
- Re: [PATCH][INCOMPLETE] sata_nv: merge ADMA support
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: [git patches] libata updates
- Re: Some sata_mv error messages
- [git patch append] sata_mv fix
- Re: sata_promise does not see hardware RAID arrays on Fasttrak TX4000
- sata_promise does not see hardware RAID arrays on Fasttrak TX4000
- Re: Resume problems on Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO M7440G -- SATA
- Re: Resume problems on Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO M7440G -- SATA
- Re: [git patches] libata updates
- Some sata_mv error messages (was: Re: 2.6.16-rc6-mm2)
- [git patches] libata updates
- [PATCH 7/12] [IDE] Set CFLAGS only for au1xxx-ide
- Re: [PATCH][INCOMPLETE] sata_nv: merge ADMA support
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: sata_Re: sata_mv success on 2.6.16-rc6-mm2
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- Re: sata_Re: sata_mv success on 2.6.16-rc6-mm2
- libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?
- [PATCH: kernel 2.6.16-rc6] CMD643 does not support DMA
- Quick patch fixes resume with host protected area
- Re: sata_mv success on 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 (was: Re: 2.6.16-rc6-mm2)
- Re: [PATCH] libata: implement minimal transport template for ->eh_timed_out
- sata_mv success on 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 (was: Re: 2.6.16-rc6-mm2)
- [PATCH] libata: implement minimal transport template for ->eh_timed_out
- Re: [PATCH][INCOMPLETE] sata_nv: merge ADMA support
- [PATCH 04/15] libata: ata_scsi_queuecmd cleanup
- [PATCH 09/15] libata: Add support for SATA attachment to SAS adapters
- [PATCH 08/15] libata: Add host lock to struct ata_port
- [PATCH 05/15] libata: Add __ata_scsi_ioctl
- [PATCH 11/15] ipr: Fixup device type check
- [PATCH 03/15] libata: ata_scsi_slave_config cleanup
- [PATCH 07/15] libata: Remove dependence on host_set->dev for SAS
- [PATCH 13/15] ipr: printk macro cleanup/removal
- [PATCH 12/15] ipr: Simplify status area dumping
- [PATCH 14/15] ipr: Reset device cleanup
- [PATCH 15/15] ipr: Support attaching SATA devices
- [PATCH 10/15] ipr: Disk remove path cleanup
- [PATCH 01/15] libata: Setup nbytes in ata_sg_init_one
- [PATCH 06/15] libata: Stop using host->max_cmd_len
- [PATCH 02/15] libata: Add some dummy noop functions
- [PATCH 0/15] libata: Add support for SATA attachment to SAS adapters
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH] AHCI SATA vendor update from VIA
- sata_sx4 for sx4060
- Re: [PATCH] AHCI SATA vendor update from VIA
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: ata_check_atapi_dma() fix for ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING LLDDs
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: use local *id instead of dev->id in ata_dev_configure()
- Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc6
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: Remove ATA_PROT_PIO_MULT
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: ata_check_atapi_dma() fix for ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING LLDDs
- Re: Warning - Maxtor SATA II and Nvidia nforce4
- re: [PATCH] AHCI SATA vendor update from VIA
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: Warning - Maxtor SATA II and Nvidia nforce4
- Re: Warning - Maxtor SATA II and Nvidia nforce4
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: ata_check_atapi_dma() fix for ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING LLDDs
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: ata_check_atapi_dma() fix for ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING LLDDs
- Re: [PATCH] AHCI SATA vendor update from VIA
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: ata_check_atapi_dma() fix for ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING LLDDs
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: ata_check_atapi_dma() fix for ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING LLDDs
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Question about VIA SATA driver
- Status of promise sata hotplug patches? (works great!)
- LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: add flush task to ata_exec_internal()
- nvidia status
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: add flush task to ata_exec_internal()
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: add flush task to ata_exec_internal()
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: ata_check_atapi_dma() fix for ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING LLDDs
- [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: add flush task to ata_exec_internal()
- RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc6
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Re: Random libata notes
- Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement per-dev xfer masks
- [PATCH 2/2] libata: move IDENTIFY info printing from ata_dev_read_id() to ata_dev_configure()
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: make ata_set_mode() responsible for failure handling
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask
- Re: [PATCH] libata crashes on incorrectly initialised ports
- Re: [PATCH] libata crashes on incorrectly initialised ports
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: make ata_set_mode() responsible for failure handling
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: make ata_set_mode() responsible for failure handling
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] libata: make per-dev transfer mode limits per-dev
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask
- Re: [PATCH] libata crashes on incorrectly initialised ports
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] libata: implement ata_dev_init()
- [PATCH] libata crashes on incorrectly initialised ports
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: Make the the in_wq check as an inline function
- [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: Make the the in_wq check as an inline function
- RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: make ata_set_mode() responsible for failure handling
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] libata: make per-dev transfer mode limits per-dev
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] libata: implement ata_dev_init()
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] libata: implement ata_unpack_xfermask()
- [PATCH 1/4] libata: implement ata_dev_disable()
- [PATCH 4/4] libata: add @disable_on_err argument to ata_set_mode()
- [PATCH 3/4] libata: make ata_set_mode() responsible for failure handling
- [PATCH 2/4] libata: use ata_dev_disable() in ata_bus_probe()
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: ata_check_atapi_dma() fix for ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING LLDDs
- [PATCHSET] libata: add @disable_on_err to ata_set_mode()
- [PATCH 1/1] libata-dev: ata_check_atapi_dma() fix for ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING LLDDs
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] libata-dev: Let ata_hsm_move() work with both irq-pio and polling pio
- [PATCH 5/5] libata-dev: Cleanup unused enums/functions
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] libata-dev: Remove trailing whitespaces
- [PATCH 4/5] libata-dev: Convert ata_pio_task() to use the new ata_hsm_move()
- [PATCH 3/5] libata-dev: Let ata_hsm_move() work with both irq-pio and polling pio
- Re: [PATCH] libata: clean up IDENTIFY printing
- [PATCH 2/5] libata-dev: Minor fix for ata_hsm_move() to work with ata_host_intr()
- [PATCH 1/5] libata-dev: Move out the HSM code from ata_host_intr()
- [PATCH 0/5] libata-dev: integrate polling pio with irq-pio (respin)
- [PATCH 3/3] libata-dev: Remove atapi_packet_task()
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- [PATCH 2/3] libata-dev: Fix merge problem with upstream
- [PATCH 1/3] libata-dev: Remove trailing whitespaces
- [PATCH 0/3] libata-dev: irq-pio minor fixes (respin)
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] libata-dev: irq-pio minor fixes
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] libata-dev: irq-pio minor fixes
- [PATCH 2/4] libata: implement ata_dev_init()
- Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement per-dev xfer masks
- Re: [PATCH] libata: clean up IDENTIFY printing
- Re: [PATCH] libata: clean up IDENTIFY printing
- [PATCH] libata: clean up IDENTIFY printing
- [PATCH] libata: clean up IDENTIFY printing
- RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- [git patch] libata fix
- Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc6
- Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc6
- Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc6
- Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc6
- Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc6
- Re: IDE CDROM - No DMA
- Re: IDE CDROM - No DMA
- Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc6
- Re: [PATCH] libata: fix class handling in ata_bus_probe()
- Re: [PATCH] libata: fix class handling in ata_bus_probe()
- Re: IDE CDROM - No DMA
- Re: [PATCH] libata: fix class handling in ata_bus_probe()
- Re: IDE CDROM - No DMA
- [PATCH] libata: fix class handling in ata_bus_probe()
- Re: IDE CDROM - No DMA
- current #upstream bug?
- Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement per-dev xfer masks
- nvidia status
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- [PATCHSET] libata: implement per-dev xfer masks
- [PATCH 2/4] libata: implement ata_dev_init()
- [PATCH 1/4] libata: implement ata_unpack_xfermask()
- [PATCH 3/4] libata: add per-dev pio/mwdma/udma_mask
- [PATCH 4/4] libata: make per-dev transfer mode limits per-dev
- Re: IDE CDROM - No DMA
- Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: stabilize for 5081 and other fixes
- Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: stabilize for 5081 and other fixes
- [PATCH] libata: check Word 88 validity in ata_id_xfer_mask()
- [PATCH] ahci: enable prefetching
- [PATCH] ahci: enable prefetching for PACKET commands
- libata ATAPI turned on
- Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: stabilize for 5081 and other fixes
- Re: Random libata notes
- Re: Random libata notes
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] libata-dev: integrate polling pio with irq-pio
- Re: [PATCH] AHCI prefetch
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] libata-dev: irq-pio minor fixes
- Re: [PATCH] ahci: fix NULL pointer dereference detected by Coverity
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] libata: improve xfer mask constants and update ata_mode_string()
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] libata: add xfer_mask handling functions
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] libata: convert pio_task and packet_task to port_task
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- Re: [PATCH] sata_sil24: lengthen softreset timeout
- [PATCH] ahci: fix NULL pointer dereference detected by Coverity
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- IDE CDROM - No DMA
- drivers/scsi/ahci.c:ahci_interrupt(): NULL pointer dereference
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/5] libata-dev: Let ata_hsm_move() work with both irq-pio and polling pio
- Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- [PATCH 5/5] libata-dev: Add back irq-pio patches, etc.
- [PATCH 2/5] libata-dev: Make dev->id dynamically allocated
- [PATCH 1/5] libata-dev: Add back missing dev->cdb_len = 16
- [PATCH 0/5] libata-dev: irq-pio minor fixes
- Re: Random libata notes
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/5] libata-dev: Convert ata_pio_task() to use the new ata_hsm_move()
- Re: Random libata notes
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/5] libata-dev: Let ata_hsm_move() work with both irq-pio and polling pio
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- [PATCH] sata_sil24: lengthen softreset timeout
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/5] libata-dev: Let ata_hsm_move() work with both irq-pio and polling pio
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] libata-dev: integrate polling pio with irq-pio
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/5] libata-dev: Convert ata_pio_task() to use the new ata_hsm_move()
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/5] libata-dev: Minor fix for ata_hsm_move() to work with ata_host_intr()
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/5] libata-dev: Move out the HSM code from ata_host_intr()
- RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Re: [PATCH] AHCI prefetch
- gigabyte iRam not seen by linux
- Re: [PATCH] ACPI support for IDE drives
- Re: drivers/scsi/sata_vsc.c: inconsistent NULL checking
- Re: drivers/scsi/sata_vsc.c: inconsistent NULL checking
- drivers/scsi/sata_vsc.c: inconsistent NULL checking
- [PATCH/RFC 5/5] libata-dev: Cleanup unused enums/functions
- [PATCH/RFC 4/5] libata-dev: Convert ata_pio_task() to use the new ata_hsm_move()
- [PATCH/RFC 3/5] libata-dev: Let ata_hsm_move() work with both irq-pio and polling pio
- [PATCH/RFC 2/5] libata-dev: Minor fix for ata_hsm_move() to work with ata_host_intr()
- [PATCH/RFC 1/5] libata-dev: Move out the HSM code from ata_host_intr()
- [PATCH/RFC 0/5] libata-dev: integrate polling pio with irq-pio
- Re: [PATCHSET] implement and use port_task
- Kernel panic on PC with broken hard drive, after DMA errors
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- [PATCH] fix too short span of sil24_issue_SRST() loop to reset non-native hard drives
- Re: SATA ATAPI AHCI error messages?
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: FW: Kernel driver for Sil 3112 (sata_sil.c) problems
- Re: With a Barracuda harddisk as hda, Linux 2.6.14 and 2.6.15 DON'T work, 2.6.11 WORKS
- With a Barracuda harddisk as hda, Linux 2.6.14 and 2.6.15 DON'T work, 2.6.11 WORKS
- Re: [PATCH] /dev/disk/by-id incomplete and unhelpful for SATA drives
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- FW: Kernel driver for Sil 3112 (sata_sil.c) problems
- Re: [PATCHSET] implement and use port_task
- Re: [PATCHSET] implement and use port_task
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] libata: add xfer_mask handling functions
- Re: [PATCHSET] implement and use port_task
- Re: libata: why do we need to define ATA_ENABLE_PATA instead of a CONFIG option?
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] libata: add xfer_mask handling functions
- Re: libata: why do we need to define ATA_ENABLE_PATA instead of a CONFIG option?
- libata: why do we need to define ATA_ENABLE_PATA instead of a CONFIG option?
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai
- Re: libata SCSI page 0x83 query
- Re: libata SCSI page 0x83 query
- Re: libata SCSI page 0x83 query
- Re: [PATCH] /dev/disk/by-id incomplete and unhelpful for SATA drives
- Re: PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- Re: PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- Re: PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- [PATCH] ACPI support for IDE drives
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- Re: PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- Re: PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- Re: PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- Re: PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- promise 300 tx4 does not recognize 4 drives
- [PATCH 6/6] libata: kill unused xfer_mode functions
- [PATCH 6/6] libata: kill unused xfer_mode functions
- [PATCH 5/6] libata: reimplement ata_set_mode() using xfer_mask helpers
- [PATCH 2/6] libata: add xfer_mask handling functions
- [PATCH 1/6] libata: improve xfer mask constants and update ata_mode_string()
- [PATCH 3/6] libata: use ata_id_xfermask() in ata_dev_configure()
- [PATCH 4/6] libata: use xfer_mask helpers in ata_dev_set_mode()
- [PATCHSET] libata: improve transfer mode handling
- Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate(), take #3
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] libata: implement port_task
- Re: [PATCH] sata_sil24: fix mwdma_mask setting
- Re: [PATCHSET] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate(), take #3
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] libata: implement port_task
- Re: nvidia 2200/2050
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] sata_sil: convert sil_port[] to u16 from unsigned long
- [PATCH] sata_sil24: fix mwdma_mask setting
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- nvidia 2200/2050
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- [PATCH 1/4] libata: re-initialize parameters before configuring
- [PATCH 4/4] libata: revalidate after transfer mode configuration
- [PATCH 3/4] libata: implement ata_dev_revalidate()
- [PATCHSET] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate(), take #3
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] sata_sil: kill bogus PCI ID 0x1095/0x0240
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] sata_sil: convert sil_port[] to u16 from unsigned long
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] sata_sil: convert sil_port[] to u16 from unsigned long
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] sata_sil: kill bogus PCI ID 0x1095/0x0240
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] sata_sil: replace sil_3112_m15w board id with sil_3112
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- [PATCH 6/6] sata_sil: cosmetic flag/constant changes
- [PATCH 5/6] sata_sil: convert sil_port[] to u16 from unsigned long
- [PATCH 4/6] sata_sil: replace register address constants with sil_port[] entry
- [PATCH 1/6] sata_sil: replace sil_3112_m15w board id with sil_3112
- [PATCHSET] sata_sil misc updates
- [PATCH 2/6] sata_sil: kill bogus PCI ID 0x1095/0x0240
- [PATCH 3/6] sata_sil: use kzalloc
- [PATCH 2/4] libata: convert pio_task and packet_task to port_task
- [PATCHSET] implement and use port_task
- [PATCH 4/4] libata: rename ATA_FLAG_FLUSH_PIO_TASK to ATA_FLAG_FLUSH_PORT_TASK
- [PATCH 1/4] libata: implement port_task
- [PATCH 3/4] libata: kill unused pio_task and packet_task
- [PATCHSET] implement and use port_task
- Re: [PATCH] ata_piix: rename PIIX_FLAG_IGN_PRESENT to PIIX_FLAG_IGNORE_PCS
- [PATCH] ata_piix: rename PIIX_FLAG_IGN_PRESENT to PIIX_FLAG_IGNORE_PCS
- [PATCH, WIP] libata iomap usage
- Re: NCQ general question
- terminal SATA troubles
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- [PATCH] AHCI prefetch
- Random libata notes
- Re: [PATCH] sata_promise: Support FastTrak TX4300/TX4310
- [PATCH] sata_promise: Support FastTrak TX4300/TX4310
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- [BUG] NULL pointer dereference (Re: PIO mode of sata_sil.c)
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: [PATCH] updated sata_promise.c with new device id
- Re: [PATCH] sata_promise: Support FastTrak TX4310
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] libata: revalidate after transfer mode configuration
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] libata: implement ata_dev_revalidate()
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] libata: convert dev->id to pointer
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: [PATCHSET] ata_piix: improve combined mode handling
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] ata_piix: don't scan non-existent device
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] libata: seperate out ata_class_present()
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] ata_piix: add a couple of flags
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: ATA Pass-Through support
- PATA failure with piix, works with libata
- Re: [PATCHSET] ata_piix: improve combined mode handling
- Re: [PATCH] libata-dev: recognize WRITE_MULTI_FUA_EXT for r/w multiple
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: ATA Pass-Through support
- Re: ATA Pass-Through support
- Patch: ide noprobe fix
- Re: [PATCH] libata-dev: recognize WRITE_MULTI_FUA_EXT for r/w multiple
- Re: [PATCH] libata-dev: recognize WRITE_MULTI_FUA_EXT for r/w multiple
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [600X S3 sleep]
- RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- [PATCH] libata-dev: recognize WRITE_MULTI_FUA_EXT for r/w multiple
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- RE: ATA Pass-Through support
- Re: ATA Pass-Through support
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: sx8 driver
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- Re: sx8 driver
- Re: sx8 driver
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- Re: sx8 driver
- Re: NCQ general question
- sx8 driver
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: libata queue contents
- Re: libata queue contents
- Re: libata queue contents
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: libata queue contents
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia: add another ide-cs CF card id
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH] rate-limit libata-scsi status/error message
- libata queue contents
- [SRC] sata_nv w/ ADMA sauce
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- RE: regarding sata_sil errata
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: NCQ general question
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Sil 3114 with 2 disks problem
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- From: James Courtier-Dutton
- [PATCH] sata_sil: remove unneeded ATA_FLAG_SRST from 3512 port info
- Re: NCQ general question
- [PATCH 3/4] libata: implement ata_dev_revalidate()
- [PATCH 4/4] libata: revalidate after transfer mode configuration
- [PATCH 1/4] libata: re-initialize parameters before configuring
- [PATCHSET] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate(), take #2
- [PATCH 3/4] libata: fold ata_dev_config() into ata_dev_configure()
- [PATCH 2/4] libata: separate out ata_dev_configure()
- [PATCH 4/4] libata: reorganize ata_bus_probe()
- [PATCH 1/4] libata: convert dev->id to pointer
- [PATCHSET] libata: reorganize ata_dev_identify(), take 3
- NCQ general question
- From: Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
- [PATCH] sata_sil: remove unaffected drives from m15w blacklist
- Re: Feature request: HDD status
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH] ahci: add softreset
- regarding sata_sil errata
- Re: [PATCHSET] ata_piix: improve combined mode handling
- Re: what is hdparm doing?
- Re: what is hdparm doing?
- From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
- Re: what is hdparm doing?
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: [ltp] ICH6M legacy hotswap?
- Re: Feature request: HDD status
- Feature request: HDD status
- what is hdparm doing?
- From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
- Re: [PATCH] libata: kill illegal kfree(id)
- Re: [ltp] ICH6M legacy hotswap?
- Re: [PATCH 12/13] ATA ACPI: use scsi_bus_shutdown for SATA/PATA
- Re: [ltp] ICH6M legacy hotswap?
- Re: [PATCH 12/13] ATA ACPI: use scsi_bus_shutdown for SATA/PATA
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: [PATCHSET] ata_piix: improve combined mode handling
- Re: [PATCH] ahci: add softreset
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- [PATCH 6/6] ata_piix: don't scan non-existent device
- [PATCH 5/6] ata_piix: reimplement piix_sata_probe()
- [PATCH 2/6] ata_piix: finer-grained port_info
- [PATCH 4/6] ata_piix: implement proper port map
- [PATCH 3/6] ata_piix: add a couple of flags
- [PATCH 1/6] libata: seperate out ata_class_present()
- [PATCHSET] ata_piix: improve combined mode handling
- translated ATA stat/err
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [ltp] ICH6M legacy hotswap?
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: [PATCH 7/13] ATA ACPI: more Makefile/Kconfig
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- [PATCH] Fixup ahci suspend / resume
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: [PATCH 10/13] ATA ACPI: do taskfile before mode commands
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: [PATCH 10/13] ATA ACPI: do taskfile before mode commands
- Re: [PATCH 10/13] ATA ACPI: do taskfile before mode commands
- Re: [PATCH 12/13] ATA ACPI: use scsi_bus_shutdown for SATA/PATA
- Re: [PATCH 7/13] ATA ACPI: more Makefile/Kconfig
- Re: [PATCH 8/13] ATA ACPI: PATA methods
- Re: [PATCH 13/13] ATA ACPI: enable writing PATA taskfiles
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- Re: [PATCH 10/13] ATA ACPI: do taskfile before mode commands
- Re: [PATCH 8/13] ATA ACPI: PATA methods
- Re: [PATCH 5/13] ATA ACPI: use debugging macros
- Re: [PATCH 4/13] ATA ACPI: add params/docs.
- Re: [PATCH 7/13] ATA ACPI: more Makefile/Kconfig
- Re: [PATCH 5/13] ATA ACPI: use debugging macros
- Re: [PATCH 4/13] ATA ACPI: add params/docs.
- Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure
- libata CHS mapping
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- ICH6M legacy hotswap?
- [PATCH] libata: kill illegal kfree(id)
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] libata: separate out ata_dev_read_id()
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] libata: separate out ata_dev_read_id()
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- bad kfree(id) ?
- Re: Kernel SeekCompleteErrors... Different from Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: Kernel SeekCompleteErrors... Different from Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions (ps2 mouse/keyboard issues)
- RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
- Re: Kernel SeekCompleteErrors... Different from Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: [PATCH] sata_promise: Port enumeration order - SATA 150 TX4, SATA 300 TX4
- Re: [PATCH] sata_promise: Port enumeration order - SATA 150 TX4, SATA 300 TX4
- RE: Kernel driver for Sil 3112 (sata_sil.c) problems
- Re: Kernel SeekCompleteErrors... Different from Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Re: Kernel SeekCompleteErrors... Different from Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
- Re: Kernel SeekCompleteErrors... Different from Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Kernel SeekCompleteErrors... Different from Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: James Courtier-Dutton
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]