Albert Lee wrote:
How about the attached renaming patch? It could make the command names more consistent to what's in the ATA/ATAPI spec. --- Albert Changes: ATA_CMD_READ => ATA_CMD_READ_DMA ATA_CMD_WRITE => ATA_CMD_WRITE_DMA ... ATA_CMD_PIO_READ => ATA_CMD_READ_PIO ATA_CMD_PIO_WRITE => ATA_CMD_WRITE_PIO ... ATA_CMD_FPDMA_READ => ATA_CMD_READ_FPDMA_QUEUED ATA_CMD_FPDMA_WRITE => ATA_CMD_WRITE_FPDMA_QUEUED
Even given the current thread's confusion, I rather like the existing names. Everybody does DMA these days, so ATA_CMD_WRITE being of DMA protocol seems the most natural to me.
Jeff - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
