On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:25:43 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28 2006, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Jens Axboe wrote: > > >> I'm sure Hannes will regenerate against upstream as well if necessary, > > >> however that depends on when this should be applied. > > > > > > It's far too late and too intrusive for 2.6.16-rc. > > > > > > It's #upstream or <null>. > > > > > Calm down. Of course I will regenerate is against #upstream. > > In fact, I've done so initially but wasn't sure what the status of > > libata-dev is. So I've diffed it against linux-git instead. > > > > Updated patch to follow. > > Thanks Hannes. I wasn't so much worried about it going directly in (I > have no problem waiting), just that there seemed to be some disagreement > on where suspend is at and what we can "support". Hi Hannes, Did you ever send the updated patch? I need it to use with the rest of the ata-acpi objects patchset for #upstream (actually for -mm). Thanks, --- ~Randy - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
