Tejun Heo wrote:
Silicon Image confirmed that 0x1095/0x0240 has never been used for
3112. Kill it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Carlos Pardo <Carlos.Pardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
4c960f8b73294d01b9307ea6775304fc8556e550
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c
index 8cb662d..0d962a4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c
@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ static void sil_post_set_mode (struct at
static const struct pci_device_id sil_pci_tbl[] = {
{ 0x1095, 0x3112, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3112 },
- { 0x1095, 0x0240, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3112 },
{ 0x1095, 0x3512, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3512 },
{ 0x1095, 0x3114, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3114 },
{ 0x1002, 0x436e, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, sil_3112 },
These things just don't get made up out of thin air. I'm wonder if it
applies to a Silicon Image product running under a proprietary driver,
or OEM product with a bunch of SiI chips on it. In any case, I'm
reluctant to remove it.
Jeff
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
