Re: NCQ general question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gentoopower wrote:
Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote:
i am thinking of buying a promise card sataII pcix.
they have two types, a card which support NCQ
and another that does not.
What is the bennifit of buying  a card with NCQ tagging ?
How about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_command_queueing

Yuck.. what a lousy wiki entry.

NCQ vs. TCQ:  NCQ has a much more efficient low-level protocol,
making the host-side (controller, operating-system) quite a bit
simpler than with NCQ.

Both use 32-deep queue depths, and neither of them are worth a
damn on Linux yet.  Except possibly in the libata ahci driver,
or vendor-provided drivers (open source, even) for some chipsets.

In theory, NCQ/TCQ can speed up a very busy fileserver that is
handling mostly tiny I/O requests.  Practically no measurable
benefit for single-user systems.

Cheers
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux