Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, all.

Mark Lord wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
..
Seems to me that your reasoning is correct. It's a fact that the
original block mapped sg lists satisfies all requirements of the device
driver and/or hardware, otherwise would be a bug. The iommu may go nuts
of course, but logically that new sg list should be choppable into the
same requirements.

I just finished going through all of the arch implementations and,
as near as I can tell, they only ever *merge* sg list items,
and never create additional sg entries.


One question though. Do IOMMU's preserve alignment? ie. Do they align 33k block on 64k boundary? I guess they do, just wanna make sure.

--
tejun
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux