Justin Piszcz wrote:
Will your verbosity patch make it into 2.6.16-rcX?
I don't think so -- it was a bit of a hack to make the ATA opcode visible at those points in the code. The better approach might be to just have separate fields for "command" and "status" in the ata tf. With that, a much less invasive patch could be prepared. I can spin one quickly here if Jeff thinks it could be gotten into 2.6.16. Otherwise, I won't -- my code base here is leagues behind the current libata-dev. Cheers - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
