Re: gigabyte iRam not seen by linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch at the tail of this mail makes ata_dev_try_classify() ignore
diagnostic code in FEATURE.  If the iRam successfully gets attached
with the patch, can you please post 'hdparm -I /dev/sdX' and 'hdparm
--Istdout /dev/sdX' of the iRam?
--- a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ ata_dev_try_classify(struct ata_port *ap
 	else if ((device == 0) && (err == 0x81))
 		/* do nothing */ ;
 	else
-		return ATA_DEV_NONE;
+		/*return ATA_DEV_NONE*/;
/* determine if device is ATA or ATAPI */
 	class = ata_dev_classify(&tf);


Hi, I'm having the same trouble with this card as everyone else. I'm wondering if anyone would care to comment about what the above patch may break. Is it going to disable safeguards, such that if a disk in my system actually does crash, I won't know it? Or, is it simply going to mean that I should be careful to only plug things into the system that I know are supported?

I'm in contact with Gigabyte, trying to get their opinion on the matter. I know others have said that they are very unhelpful when it comes to linux support, but I'm hoping that if we can show them what's wrong, they could roll up a fix in a firmware release.

-Bryan

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux