On 3/1/06, Eric D. Mudama <edmudama@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I believe this core should not be part of the FUA whitelist. If I > remember correctly, there are other implementations out there with > similar limitations to opcodes this "new" to ATA. That being said, I see from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177951 that a blacklisting of some Maxtor drives for this issue has supposedly occurred or been pushed and accepted "upstream" in git .... For the obvious (selfish) reasons, I'd like to minimize the number of Maxtor drives that are blacklisted, as I don't believe this is a drive issue at all. If there's a drive model out there reporting support for FUA but screwing it up, I'm all ears as that's something I need to know about. If basic adapter functional testing is required for some of these low-level commands, then that might be something I can help with too (on a very limited scale), since we have access to ~100 different chipsets. --eric - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
