Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 21 2006, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 14:38 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Strongly agreed.  ISTR JamesB had some concrete thoughts in that
> > direction, but they never made it beyond an IRC channel and/or a few
> > emails.
> 
> Actually, I had a patch for it ... but it never really went anywhere.
> The argument being that the machines which would actually need it didn't
> use IDE anyway ...

Do <insert random device here> really never have segment or boundary
restrictions outside of IDE? Seems to me that supporting that would be
the conservative and sane thing to do.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux