Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Axboe wrote:
My explanation was for the block layer part of course, I'm hoping (did
not check) that the iommu has similar sane defaults.

Part of the problem is that the iommu doesn't know as much as the block layer.


But this still really wants a unification of the dma restrictions...

Strongly agreed. ISTR JamesB had some concrete thoughts in that direction, but they never made it beyond an IRC channel and/or a few emails.

	Jeff



-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux