Re: libata+SGIO: is .dma_boundary respected?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 21 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >My explanation was for the block layer part of course, I'm hoping (did
> >not check) that the iommu has similar sane defaults.
> 
> Part of the problem is that the iommu doesn't know as much as the block 
> layer.

Right, this is what needs fixing.

> >But this still really wants a unification of the dma restrictions...
> 
> Strongly agreed.  ISTR JamesB had some concrete thoughts in that 
> direction, but they never made it beyond an IRC channel and/or a few 
> emails.

The pci dev already holds the dma address, we could add dma boundary and
dma segment size as well?

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux