Mark Lord wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
Justin Piszcz wrote:
Will your verbosity patch make it into 2.6.16-rcX?
I don't think so -- it was a bit of a hack to make the ATA opcode
visible at those points in the code.
The better approach might be to just have separate fields
for "command" and "status" in the ata tf. With that, a much less
invasive patch could be prepared.
I can spin one quickly here if Jeff thinks it could
be gotten into 2.6.16. Otherwise, I won't -- my code base
here is leagues behind the current libata-dev.
Nah we should really dump the full taskfile...
Agreed. But the original command byte is not stored anywhere
for us to dump it from.
er eh?
All callers of ata_to_sense_error() have the full taskfile available.
Jeff
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
