On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:53 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > >Subject : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA) > > > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159 > > > >Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@xxxxxx> > > > >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >Status : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it > > > > > > > > > This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. > > > It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this. > > > > It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since > > according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15. > > It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a > goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a > regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on > earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison. > > So please scratch that entry. I'll third that request/comment. --- ~Randy - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
