Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: Trouble with mock
From
: Michael Schwendt
Thunderbird/Evolution quirks
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Trouble with mock
From
: Jochen Schmitt
rawhide report: 20090624 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Plase switch to intel-2.8 prerelease
From
: Clemens Eisserer
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Frank Murphy
Terminal emulator supporting Indic scripts like {kn, hi, pa}_IN.utf-8
From
: Michal Nowak
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: TK009
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: TK009
Re: rpm package with many files inside
From
: Howard Wilkinson
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
doubt regarding package name
From
: Rakesh Pandit
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Simon Andrews
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Simon Andrews
Re: X11 on intel (rawhide)
From
: Ilyes Gouta
KDE-SIG weekly report (26/2009)
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: bodhi - testing back to pending?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Martin Langhoff
Re: bodhi - testing back to pending?
From
: Bill McGonigle
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: bodhi - testing back to pending?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: X11 on intel (rawhide)
From
: Clemens Eisserer
Re: XInput.h has moved to libXi
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Pulseaudio question...
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: X11 on intel (rawhide)
From
: darrell pfeifer
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: X11 on intel (rawhide)
From
: darrell pfeifer
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: rpms/php-pecl-geoip/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 php-pecl-geoip.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
From
: Todd Zullinger
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Sam Varshavchik
Re: rpms/php-pecl-geoip/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 php-pecl-geoip.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Rawhide updates?
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Rawhide updates?
From
: Paul
X11 on intel (rawhide)
From
: Paul
bodhi - testing back to pending?
From
: Bill McGonigle
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Martin Langhoff
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: rpms/php-pecl-geoip/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 php-pecl-geoip.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rpms/php-pecl-geoip/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 php-pecl-geoip.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
From
: Todd Zullinger
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Clemens Eisserer
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Martin Langhoff
rawhide report: 20090623 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Pulseaudio question...
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: rpms/php-pecl-geoip/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 php-pecl-geoip.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Fwd: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Clemens Eisserer
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: Update descriptions hosed
From
: Luke Macken
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: autodownloader, live spins and packaging
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Pulseaudio question...
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Localization versus Requires: aspell-en
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Building packages for EPEL
From
: Mat Booth
Re: rpm package with many files inside
From
: Florian Festi
Re: autodownloader, live spins and packaging
From
: Rahul Sundaram
autodownloader, live spins and packaging
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Building packages for EPEL
From
: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Re: F11 deltarpms being built against rawhide base release
From
: Luke Macken
Building packages for EPEL
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: rpm package with many files inside
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Spins SIG could use some more active participants
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Krzysztof Halasa
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jesse Keating
Suggestion for improvement https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Clemens Eisserer
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Packaging PHP
From
: Patrick MONNERAT
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Packaging PHP
From
: Remi Collet
Re: rawhide report: 20090621 changes
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Dave Jones
Heads-Up: rtkit
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jerry James
Re: Packaging PHP
From
: Christopher Stone
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: rpm package with many files inside
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Dan Williams
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Dan Williams
Outage Notification - 2009-06-23 20:00 UTC
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Josh Boyer
Packaging PHP
From
: Patrick MONNERAT
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: TK009
Re: F11: LVM over MD is broken. Switch back to F10?
From
: Gilboa Davara
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Reindl Harald
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Josh Boyer
XInput.h has moved to libXi
From
: Peter Hutterer
Re: .spec file help - need buildrequires to depend on fedora version
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Pulseaudio question...
From
: Pavel Lisy
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: rpm package with many files inside
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jesse Keating
rpm package with many files inside
From
: Jan Chadima
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Horst H. von Brand
Re: rawhide report: 20090621 changes (don't upgrade x86_64 rawhide hosts)
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: rawhide report: 20090621 changes
From
: Horst H. von Brand
Re: .spec file help - need buildrequires to depend on fedora version
From
: Todd Zullinger
.spec file help - need buildrequires to depend on fedora version
From
: Carl Byington
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Ben Boeckel
Re: F11: LVM over MD is broken. Switch back to F10?
From
: Ian Pilcher
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Dave Jones
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: drago01
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Dave Jones
Re: [VERY LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report: Fedora 11 state
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: TK009
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Michael Schwendt
rawhide report: 20090621 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: John W. Linville
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Glen Turner
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Martin Sourada
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Prasad H. L.
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: drago01
Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Bharath
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Martin Sourada
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Michal Schmidt
Re: [VERY LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report: Fedora 11 state
From
: Ville Skyttä
Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: King InuYasha
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Glen Turner
Re: Update descriptions hosed
From
: Todd Zullinger
Re: Orphaned packages fxload, unison*
From
: Dave Jones
[VERY LONG] The fonts SIG irregular status report: Fedora 11 state
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: bind-chroot in F11
From
: Carl Byington
Re: F11: LVM over MD is broken. Switch back to F10?
From
: Ricky Zhou
Re: Heads up: bluetoothd on-demand startup
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: The Devel Sig Wiki
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Update descriptions hosed
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: More mock problems
From
: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
rawhide report: 20090620 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Pulseaudio question...
From
: John J. McDonough
Re: F11: LVM over MD is broken. Switch back to F10?
From
: Gilboa Davara
Re: Update descriptions hosed
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: F11: LVM over MD is broken. Switch back to F10?
From
: Björn Persson
Re: system-config-firewall picking up slack where firestarter fell off
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Update descriptions hosed
From
: Christoph Wickert
The Devel Sig Wiki
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: F11 deltarpms being built against rawhide base release
From
: Jonathan Dieter
Re: F11 deltarpms being built against rawhide base release
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: F11 deltarpms being built against rawhide base release
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: F11 deltarpms being built against rawhide base release
From
: Jonathan Dieter
F11: LVM over MD is broken. Switch back to F10?
From
: Gilboa Davara
F11 deltarpms being built against rawhide base release
From
: Bradley Baetz
Pulseaudio question...
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
FESco meeting summary for 20090619
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Orphaned packages fxload, unison*
From
: Stephen Warren
Re: system-config-firewall picking up slack where firestarter fell off
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Andre Robatino
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
From
: David Nielsen
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
From
: Ben Boeckel
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
From
: Martin Sourada
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
From
: David Nielsen
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
From
: Peter Robinson
rawhide report: 20090619 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
From
: Harsha gowda
Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-06-19
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
From
: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
From
: Harsha gowda
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
From
: Rahul Sundaram
!Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
From
: Harsha gowda
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: BTRFS in 2.6.31-rcwhatever
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: TK009
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Simo Sorce
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Plan for tomorrow's (20090619) FESCo meeting
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Colin Walters
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Robert Marcano
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
rawhide report: 20090618 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Martin Langhoff
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Martin Langhoff
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Fedora 11 s390x preview
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Martin Langhoff
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Localization versus Requires: aspell-en
From
: Caolán McNamara
Fedora 11 s390x preview
From
: Karsten Hopp
Re: Localization versus Requires: aspell-en
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: kaboon
Re: Localization versus Requires: aspell-en
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Localization versus Requires: aspell-en
From
: Florian Festi
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jarod Wilson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Jarod Wilson
Localization versus Requires: aspell-en
From
: Chitlesh GOORAH
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: drago01
Re: GDM Language list...
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: James Hubbard
Re: BTRFS in 2.6.31-rcwhatever
From
: Josef Bacik
Re: Requires: %{_libdir}/pkgconfig
From
: Michael Schwendt
PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: BTRFS in 2.6.31-rcwhatever
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: splitting a meta package in F-11
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: yersinia
Re: GDM Language list...
From
: Jens Petersen
Re: how to patch native pacakge
From
: Farkas Levente
Re: gpsdrive and some perl packaging needed
From
: Marcela Maslanova
Re: gpsdrive and some perl packaging needed
From
: Iain Arnell
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: gpsdrive and some perl packaging needed
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Gerd Hoffmann
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Gerd Hoffmann
Re: BTRFS in 2.6.31-rcwhatever
From
: David Nielsen
Install Test plan for Fedora 12, any feedback would be welcome
From
: Liam
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Luya Tshimbalanga
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Steven Moix
Re: Strange /etc/fedora-release and smolt help
From
: Eric Springer
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Luya Tshimbalanga
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bob Arendt
Re: gpsdrive and some perl packaging needed
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chris Weyl
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: gpsdrive and some perl packaging needed
From
: Iain Arnell
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: gpsdrive and some perl packaging needed
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Mike Chambers
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Kyle McMartin
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Krzysztof Halasa
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Krzysztof Halasa
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: gpsdrive and some perl packaging needed
From
: Murilo Opsfelder Araújo
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Chris Adams
Re: BTRFS in 2.6.31-rcwhatever
From
: Matej Cepl
recording more metrics and doing more data mining about Fedora
From
: Ian Weller
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Chris Ball
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: James Hubbard
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Ingvar Hagelund
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: David
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Greg Trounson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: how to patch native pacakge
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Steven M. Parrish
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: drago01
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: David
Re: iptables/firewall brainstorming
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Chris Ball
maintainers needed
From
: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Upgrade to F11, now yum python module missing
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: David
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jarod Wilson
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: drago01
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: drago01
Re: No sound in rawhide
From
: Ray Van Dolson
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: David
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Steven Moix
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Robert 'Bob' Jensen
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Robert 'Bob' Jensen
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chris Weyl
gpsdrive and some perl packaging needed
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Bill Nottingham
rawhide report: 20090617 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: No sound in rawhide
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Ville Skyttä
BTRFS in 2.6.31-rcwhatever
From
: Josef Bacik
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: No sound in rawhide
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: No sound in rawhide
From
: Ray Van Dolson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Ingvar Hagelund
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Chuck Anderson
rpm AutoRequires/AutoProvides and dsos not in linker path, do we care ?
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: No sound in rawhide
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: No sound in rawhide
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Steven Moix
Re: No sound in rawhide
From
: Kjartan Maraas
Re: Signing server? (Re: Updates testing for F-11)
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Push?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Michael Fleming
Re: Push?
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: drago01
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Gilboa Davara
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Luya Tshimbalanga
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Thoughts? Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Thoughts? Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: iptables/firewall brainstorming
From
: Thomas Woerner
Thoughts? Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: drago01
Re: Heads up: NoArch Sub Packages Feature continues
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Heads up: NoArch Sub Packages Feature continues
From
: Florian Festi
Re: Heads up: NoArch Sub Packages Feature continues
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: David
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Mani A
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Mani A
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: packaging web applications, SELinux
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Heads up: NoArch Sub Packages Feature continues
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: Heads up: NoArch Sub Packages Feature continues
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Push?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Adam Williamson
Please quit the nonsense, Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12? DO NOT VOTE for Kevin Kofler!
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Split Media - A use case
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12
From
: Martin Ebourne
Re: GDM Language list...
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: Split Media - A use case
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: GDM Language list...
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeroen van Meeuwen
Re: No bluetooth for PulseAudio nonbelievers
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: David
Re: mount shows dm-* instead og dev/mapper/*
From
: Karel Zak
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: iptables/firewall brainstorming
From
: Jud Craft
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: King InuYasha
Re: iptables/firewall brainstorming
From
: Jud Craft
Re: using CD/DVD as media
From
: David
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: King InuYasha
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Steven M. Parrish
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Jud Craft
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Tomas Mraz
using CD/DVD as media
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Dan Williams
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: mount shows dm-* instead og dev/mapper/*
From
: Laurent Jacquot
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12? DO NOT VOTE for Kevin Kofler!
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: No sound in rawhide
From
: drago01
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12? DO NOT VOTE for Kevin Kofler!
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12? DO NOT VOTE for Kevin Kofler!
From
: Robert 'Bob' Jensen
Re: What I HATE about F11
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: drago01
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Autovectorization (was Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12)
From
: drago01
Fedora 11 Retrospective Recap
From
: John Poelstra
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: 梁穗隆
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: King InuYasha
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Jonathan Dieter
Re: packaging web applications, SELinux
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: packaging web applications, SELinux
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: packaging web applications, SELinux
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: Do we need split media CDs for F12?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: packaging web applications, SELinux
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Bill Nottingham
packaging web applications, SELinux
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-12
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Paul Jakma
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Farkas Levente
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Paul Jakma
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Ben Boeckel
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Josh Boyer
Much improvement for minimal installs
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: No sound in rawhide
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: Heads up: NoArch Sub Packages Feature continues
From
: John5342
Broken dependencies in Fedora 10 - 2009-06-16
From
: Michael Schwendt
Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-06-16
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Daniel Drake
Re: iptables/firewall brainstorming
From
: Thomas Woerner
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12
From
: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
