On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 11:42 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Chris Adams (cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Removing support for still-functional hardware is a trademark of > > Microsoft, not Linux. > > > > I'd also argue that doing another full rebuild of the OS for a 1% > > performance gain on a single architecture is not a particularly > > production use of resources. > > The 1% comes from i586 -> i686; SSE2 would be additional on top of > that. But given the vehement opposition, I can see dropping the SSE2 > requirement. I'm still fairly convinced that going to i686 is the right > move - we really don't support i586 as a practical matter, and even > the Geode should still work with that. Furthermore, it's likely we'll > have a mass rebuild for LZMA support and/or debuginfo changes, so it's > no additional cost. This may have been asked before, but is the Celeron M processor in the EeePC 701 i686? It supports both SSE2 and cmov, but not PAE. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
