Chris Adams (cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Removing support for still-functional hardware is a trademark of > Microsoft, not Linux. > > I'd also argue that doing another full rebuild of the OS for a 1% > performance gain on a single architecture is not a particularly > production use of resources. The 1% comes from i586 -> i686; SSE2 would be additional on top of that. But given the vehement opposition, I can see dropping the SSE2 requirement. I'm still fairly convinced that going to i686 is the right move - we really don't support i586 as a practical matter, and even the Geode should still work with that. Furthermore, it's likely we'll have a mass rebuild for LZMA support and/or debuginfo changes, so it's no additional cost. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
