Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 16:04 -0700 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: > On 06/18/2009 02:41 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > There is no SIG yet because A SIG needs APPROVAL from the board. But > > there already are couple of people interested: Marc Wiriadisastra, Simon > > Wesp, Sebastian Vahl and two people from the LXDE team who have joined > > Fedora recently but are still waiting for sponsorship in the ambassadors > > group. And me of course as the main LXDE maintainer. > > > I was under the impression that a subproject needed some sort of > approval but a SIG was much more free-form. I was unable to find > anything useful on the wiki to confirm or deny this, though. You are correct, I re-read the "Defining projects" page [1] and realized I was wrong. Quote: > It is not necessary, however, for contributors to receive the approval > of any existing body to form a SIG. Some ideas may not even involve > support from existing Fedora Project bodies. The Fedora Project Board > retains the right, however, to provide oversight over any SIG if > necessary, to appoint a body to that end, or to move a SIG under the > umbrella of an existing body. Such actions should rarely be necessary, > though, given a SIG with a well-defined mission and objectives. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Defining_projects > -Toshio Kind regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
