On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:46:30AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>>>> I'm not sure I understand why not. Are you saying that if RedHat >>>>> decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in >>>>> making that a primary arch? >>>> >>>> ppc/ppc64 is supported in RHEL. It is no longer a primary arch in Fedora. >>> >>>Sorry? I thought it was still primary until after F-12. So yes its >>>scheduled to be a secondard arch for F-13 in 12 months time. Its not >>>one yet. >> >> Correct. Though in the context of the discussion, it won't be in the RHEL7 >> timeframe. I was simply using it as a counter to the "but RHEL" argument. > >I don't see RHEL as any form of argument. RedHat does a mass recompile Nor I. That was my entire point. Since we agree, and I'm utterly confused as to why you decided to nit-pick the ppc thing as a counter to a RHEL argument, perhaps it's best if we just agree to agree? josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
