Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:31:17PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> BTW are those new VIA netbooks SSE2-capable?
>>>>
>>> Additionally, what will this do to RHEL?  I can't imagine RHEL  
>>> customers being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386 would  
>>> still be in RHEL, it would worry me that it would only be a secondary 
>>> arch in Fedora. . .
>>
>> This is not relevant for fedora's decisions.
>>
>> -sv
>>
> I'm not sure I understand why not.  Are you saying that if RedHat  
> decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in  
> making that a primary arch?

ppc/ppc64 is supported in RHEL.  It is no longer a primary arch in Fedora.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux