Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Seth Vidal wrote:


On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:

Seth Vidal wrote:


On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote:


BTW are those new VIA netbooks SSE2-capable?

Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL customers being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386 would still be in RHEL, it would worry me that it would only be a secondary arch in Fedora. . .

This is not relevant for fedora's decisions.

-sv

I'm not sure I understand why not. Are you saying that if RedHat decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in making that a primary arch?


I'm saying since rhel goals and guidelines are not public knowledge we cannot go guessing at them and it is not relevant for what fedora needs to do.

-sv

Fair enough.

--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux