Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:56:07PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
 
 > I *wish* it made a difference. I did an upgrade am an left with a host 
 > of fc10 packages because the fc11 ones weren't considered newer.
 > 
 > For example people with updates-testing enabled on fc10 got a 
 > non-upgraded yum because the versions were the same (except for 
 > fc10/fc11) and it stopped working because python went from 2.5 to 2.6.
 
That's messed up. We used to check just before release time that this
situation never occured.  It should probably be added to the rel-eng
release checklist if it isn't there already.

	Dave

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux