Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Bharath<ajeetbharath@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Why is necessary to have a particular package tagged as fc10 or fc11?? What
> is the significance.? As it is, versions of the packages keep changing
> independent of the Fedora versions.
> For example :
>
> kdebase-4.2.3-1.fc10.i386 is available for fc10
> and the same version
> kdebase-4.2.3-1.fc11.i386 is available for fc11
>
> It wastes space,time(while upgrading from fc10 to fc11).... (I invite ppl to
> add to the list)

The package has been rebuilt with a newer gcc and a newer rpm
(stringer hash) so no its not the same package with a different name.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux