I second this. Can't we have only one stable repository which is for "Fedora", instead of one each FC10, FC11, ...? "development", "testing" and "stable" three repositories for "Fedora" as a whole and snapshots of stable as releases? That would make definitely user's life simple and I believe would make so even for the developers. Regards, Prasad 2009/6/21 Bharath <ajeetbharath@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi all, > > Why is necessary to have a particular package tagged as fc10 or fc11?? What > is the significance.? As it is, versions of the packages keep changing > independent of the Fedora versions. > For example : > > kdebase-4.2.3-1.fc10.i386 is available for fc10 > and the same version > kdebase-4.2.3-1.fc11.i386 is available for fc11 > > It wastes space,time(while upgrading from fc10 to fc11).... (I invite ppl to > add to the list) > > Regards > Bharath > > -- > All roads lead to some other roads > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- Prasad H. L. PhD Student (with Dr. Shalabh Bhatnagar) Department of Computer Science and Automation, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560012 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
