On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:35:03 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Could you expand on this? What part of it do you not like? How can we >> improve it? >> >> We have the source and the upstream maintainer has been very responsive >> so far, so hopefully we can enhance it to meet our needs. > > Why do we need this bot at all? All it takes is a human volunteer (a > single one, or possibly 2 who can agree on who does the work when, not a > rotation through all FESCo members, I know that didn't work and it > doesn't surprise me) to post the logs and write the summaries. The > volunteer doesn't even have to be a FESCo member, just willing to attend > the meetings. Clearly the human volunteer idea didn't work. It was a shambles that there were so many meetings with no minutes or even transcripts coming out of them. Didn't look at all good for an open project. I like the bot. The format is good enough, the summary is a bonus, and it's useful to see how/why decisions were made and know who to vote back into office and who not. Cheers, Martin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
