Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 02:55 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > Is there going to be a way to tell which binaries actually use sse2
> > instructions, so that the others can be inherited by a secondary arch?
> 
> Due to how GCC works, if the compiler flags enable SSE/SSE2, basically all
> the binaries will be using some SSE/SSE2 instructions.

And on the various SSE-capable CPUs, how much benefit does that actually
give us?

I'm after a system-wide answer, not a microbenchmark for zlib or crypto
code. It should take into account any overheads involved in
saving/restoring registers on context switch that wouldn't otherwise
have to be saved/restored.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux