Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/22/2009 06:56 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:20:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 06/22/2009 05:35 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>>> Isn't the scripts Michael Schwendt refers to, not useful anymore? Even
>>>
>>> It's useful.  It's generally after the fact though, and in the long run I think
>>> we want to be proactive, not reactive.
>>
>> I agree but we aren't even reacting much now. If the scripts run from
>> infrastructure systems automatically as opposed to having someone run it
>> manually, I suspect it would help fix most of the issues we are
>> currently having.
> 
> True.  Care to file a rel-eng ticket suggesting we setup a cronjob to do so?
> The script will likely need some rework and it may take some time, but the
> ticket is a good starting point.

Here, you go

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1471

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux