Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/22/2009 05:35 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:

>> Isn't the scripts Michael Schwendt refers to, not useful anymore? Even
> 
> It's useful.  It's generally after the fact though, and in the long run I think
> we want to be proactive, not reactive.

I agree but we aren't even reacting much now. If the scripts run from
infrastructure systems automatically as opposed to having someone run it
manually, I suspect it would help fix most of the issues we are
currently having.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux