On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:16:30AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:04:21AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:49:14PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > >>On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:08 +1000, Bradley Baetz wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Running F11 (x86_64), I've noticed that not all updates have deltarpms > >>> built for them. It looks like there is one built for the package, but > >>> the source version is wrong. > >>> > >>> For example gvfs-1.2.3-6.f11 is in the latest set of updates. I > >>> currently have 1.2.3-2.f11 installed, but the drpm is > >>> gvfs-1.2.3-3.fc12_1.2.3-6.fc11.x86_64.drpm, (f12, not f11, and 1.2.3-3 > >>> never got pushed to f11) which won't work... > >>> > >>> Presumably there should be drpms built against release+prev-update, or > >>> ideally one drpm for any update released in the previous week. > >>> > >>> Other packages (openssl, qemu) don't seem to have .drpms built at all. > >> > >>I would suggest creating a bug report against createrepo for the wrong > >>source rpm. > > > >This sounds more like a mash config issue than a createrepo bug. > > I've filed ticket 1938 against rel-eng. Hopefully we can get this fixed > before the next updates push. I just pushed out a new version of bodhi into production with a fix. luke -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
