Re: F11 deltarpms being built against rawhide base release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:16:30AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:04:21AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:49:14PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> >>On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:08 +1000, Bradley Baetz wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> Running F11 (x86_64), I've noticed that not all updates have deltarpms 
> >>> built for them. It looks like there is one built for the package, but 
> >>> the source version is wrong.
> >>> 
> >>> For example gvfs-1.2.3-6.f11 is in the latest set of updates. I 
> >>> currently have 1.2.3-2.f11 installed, but the drpm is 
> >>> gvfs-1.2.3-3.fc12_1.2.3-6.fc11.x86_64.drpm, (f12, not f11, and 1.2.3-3 
> >>> never got pushed to f11) which won't work...
> >>> 
> >>> Presumably there should be drpms built against release+prev-update, or 
> >>> ideally one drpm for any update released in the previous week.
> >>> 
> >>> Other packages (openssl, qemu) don't seem to have .drpms built at all.
> >>
> >>I would suggest creating a bug report against createrepo for the wrong
> >>source rpm.
> >
> >This sounds more like a mash config issue than a createrepo bug.
> 
> I've filed ticket 1938 against rel-eng.  Hopefully we can get this fixed
> before the next updates push.

I just pushed out a new version of bodhi into production with a fix.

luke

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux