On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:53 +0200, David Nielsen wrote: > > > 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> > > mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12 > ----------------------- > * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson > <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.4.2-1 > - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1 > - Add support for ppc and ppc64 > > - Add label for udev-acl > > > > is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision tags > for alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else? > > Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's unfortunate > but that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on the > matter if you bring them to their attention. He's not talking about upstream, he's talking about the Fedora package release tag. There is a policy for the handling of pre-releases in the release tag: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
