-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Nielsen wrote: > 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12 >>> ----------------------- >>> * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson <paul@all-the- johnsons.co.uk> - 2.4.2-1 >>> - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1 >>> - Add support for ppc and ppc64 >>> - Add label for udev-acl >>> >>> >> is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision tags for >> alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else? >> > > Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's unfortunate but > that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on the matter if > you bring them to their attention. > > - David This is not an upstream issue, but a packaging one. Release: 0.x is how you should mark prereleases so that -1 is the actual release. Example: kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.12.20090519svn.fc11.x86_64 k-p-nm-0.1 can have a Release: 1 with this scheme. - --Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAko8DZoACgkQiPi+MRHG3qS77ACgtDdrNf+lo02KDHDT5QHov0Il PygAnAkMp7Yi61+OKSHVCxhJexDymYcj =PnQs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
