Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





2009/6/20 Ben Boeckel <MathStuf@xxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Nielsen wrote:

> 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12
>>> -----------------------
>>> * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson <paul@all-the-
johnsons.co.uk> - 2.4.2-1
>>> - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1
>>> - Add support for ppc and ppc64
>>> - Add label for udev-acl
>>>
>>>
>> is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision
tags for
>> alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else?
>>
>
> Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's
unfortunate but
> that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on
the matter if
> you bring them to their attention.
>
> - David


This is not an upstream issue, but a packaging one. Release:
0.x is how you should mark prereleases so that -1 is the actual
release.

Example:
kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.12.20090519svn.fc11.x86_64

k-p-nm-0.1 can have a Release: 1 with this scheme.

My apologies.

- David

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux