2009/6/20 Ben Boeckel <MathStuf@xxxxxxxxx>
My apologies.
- David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This is not an upstream issue, but a packaging one. Release:
David Nielsen wrote:
> 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12
>>> -----------------------
>>> * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson <paul@all-the-
johnsons.co.uk> - 2.4.2-1
>>> - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1
>>> - Add support for ppc and ppc64
>>> - Add label for udev-acl
>>>
>>>
>> is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision
tags for
>> alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else?
>>
>
> Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's
unfortunate but
> that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on
the matter if
> you bring them to their attention.
>
> - David
0.x is how you should mark prereleases so that -1 is the actual
release.
Example:
kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.12.20090519svn.fc11.x86_64
k-p-nm-0.1 can have a Release: 1 with this scheme.
My apologies.
- David
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
