On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:31 PM, James Hubbard<jameshubbard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Jeff Spaleta<jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:28 PM, James Hubbard<jameshubbard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Trying to berate people into using x86_64 as I've seen in this and >>> other threads has gotten annoying. >> >> Berate? I'm not trying to berate anyone. What I am trying to do is get >> a handle on how to potentially mitigate as much as possible avoidable >> impact associated with an architecture policy change if and when it >> happens. If running 32bit Fedora on 64bit hardware is widespread, any >> substantial change in policy with regard to 32bit maybe more >> disruptive than we originally realize. Hmm, I wonder does smolt give >> any relevant info as to my question. Can smolt tell give me an >> indication of the percentage of 64bit capable systems which are >> running 32bit Fedora? Hmm. > > Sorry, I'm not saying you specifically. There have a been a far > number of messages in which tone has seemed to be that you have to use > x86_64 if you have hardware. > > My apologies. s/have to/should/ Unless you have a specific reason not do so. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
