On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Jeff Spaleta<jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:28 PM, James Hubbard<jameshubbard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Trying to berate people into using x86_64 as I've seen in this and >> other threads has gotten annoying. > > Berate? I'm not trying to berate anyone. What I am trying to do is get > a handle on how to potentially mitigate as much as possible avoidable > impact associated with an architecture policy change if and when it > happens. If running 32bit Fedora on 64bit hardware is widespread, any > substantial change in policy with regard to 32bit maybe more > disruptive than we originally realize. Hmm, I wonder does smolt give > any relevant info as to my question. Can smolt tell give me an > indication of the percentage of 64bit capable systems which are > running 32bit Fedora? Hmm. Sorry, I'm not saying you specifically. There have a been a far number of messages in which tone has seemed to be that you have to use x86_64 if you have hardware. My apologies. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
