On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:50:43PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Chuck Anderson (cra@xxxxxxx) said: > > > "system-wide" includes paths mentioned in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*, which are > > > files provided by other packages. Suddenly your search scope is > > > unbounded again. > > > > Not really unbounded. If a package puts a file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ > > then the library is now available system-wide, so it should be > > searched by autorequires/autoprovides. > > The package that puts the file in ld.so.conf.d and the package that > puts libraries into the location specified in that file may not be > the same package, and actually may have no dependencies between > them at all... Do we have any examples of that? I'd be inclined to say if there are a very few cases where one package provides an ld.so.conf.d file that ends up being used by many other packages, we should just put that path into the system default /etc/ld.so.conf, so it is always present. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
