Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:02:18 +0200, Kevin wrote:

> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Then with the switch to koji+bodhi a few package owners complained loudly
> > about false positives that were caused by pending builds, which were not
> > found in the master repo yet. A few other package owners jumped upon the
> > train and questioned the usefulness of the script, since they were of the
> > opinion that breaking upgrade paths the way they did it with
> > updates-testing and stable updates would not be considered a problem.
> 
> The actual issue we complained about was [...]

Let's not argue about memories. I referred to the earlier complaints,
those about the upgradecheck*.py script and how to handle updates-testing,
pending, and unreleased updates in koji.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux