On 16.06.2009 16:35, Seth Vidal wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> Could you expand on this? What part of it do you not like? >>> How can we improve it? >>> >>> We have the source and the upstream maintainer has been very responsive >>> so far, so hopefully we can enhance it to meet our needs. >> Why do we need this bot at all? All it takes is a human volunteer (a single >> one, or possibly 2 who can agree on who does the work when, not a rotation >> through all FESCo members, I know that didn't work and it doesn't surprise >> me) to post the logs and write the summaries. The volunteer doesn't even >> have to be a FESCo member, just willing to attend the meetings. > > b/c it is a boring task and computers are made for that. +1 -- but at using the bot and adjusting and enhancing the stuff that the bot output slightly might be worth the work and would be the good compromise afaic -- especially in cases/areas where the bot simply can't know what's needed to make things understandable for humans that are the target audience here. And those adjustments should be just a few minutes work that I guess is definitely worth it sometimes. CU knurd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
