On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:01:29PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:08:11 -0400, Dave wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:56:07PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: >> >> > I *wish* it made a difference. I did an upgrade am an left with a host >> > of fc10 packages because the fc11 ones weren't considered newer. >> > >> > For example people with updates-testing enabled on fc10 got a >> > non-upgraded yum because the versions were the same (except for >> > fc10/fc11) and it stopped working because python went from 2.5 to 2.6. >> >> That's messed up. We used to check just before release time that this >> situation never occured. > ^^^^^ > >Even later there used to be another script that queried koji for more >accurate package release versions, but it has never been run regularly, >not even prior to the next Fedora release. Yep. It still exists and can be run. > >> It should probably be added to the rel-eng >> release checklist if it isn't there already. > >Does rel-eng have any interest at all in avoiding some upgrade path >problems? I don't see that. Running a script to catch _some_ issues would While you might not see it, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I used to run the script myself. Lately, I have both forgotten and had little time to do so. I can try and poke at it again. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
