Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 23:46 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:

> The problem with this method is it involves a bit more work, because you
> can't just send the exact same build to Rawhide and to a stable release
> together. I suppose it might also be a bit tough to police
> automatically: MDV updates are gatekeeper-ed by the security team, so
> this is policed manually there (if you don't version your candidate
> update package properly, it doesn't get sent out as an update, and you
> get an email telling you what you did wrong).

..and the obvious third problem that this doesn't help when you ship a
new version of the package as an official update, of course. In that
case you can still get bitten by the 'old' release updates being newer
than 'new' release media case.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux