Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Boeckel wrote:
> However, if you're upgrading to the DVD, yes, there will be
> broken deps from updates-testing. Since updates-testing of
> F(n-1) is a moving target that can pass GA of Fn's NVR set very
> quickly, forcing F11 > F10 in all cases is unacceptable and
> would stunt releases that aren't (Rawhide - 1).

The problem is not just updates-testing. Stable updates have overrun F11
too, in fact for KDE they did before F11 was even released. Upgrading from
the installer DVD, or any other method which doesn't include updates, is
broken by design.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux