Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Adam Miller
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Bryn M. Reeves
Re: RFC: Kernel changes that may affect desktops
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: 梁穗隆
Re: RFC: Kernel changes that may affect desktops
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Kevin Kofler
rawhide report: 20090630 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: RFC: Kernel changes that may affect desktops
From
: Dimi Paun
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: RFC: Kernel changes that may affect desktops
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: RFC: Kernel changes that may affect desktops
From
: Adam Miller
Re: RFC: Kernel changes that may affect desktops
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: RFC: Kernel changes that may affect desktops
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: RFC: Kernel changes that may affect desktops
From
: Rahul Sundaram
RFC: Kernel changes that may affect desktops
From
: Matthew Garrett
Updating DirectFB 1.4.0 in Rawhide - SONAME change
From
: Nicolas Chauvet
Removing obsolete buildings from Bodi
From
: Paulo Cavalcanti
Re: FAO: Programmers Quick Q?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Installing Fedora with software based synthesizer for sceenreader
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: 梁穗隆
Re: Heads up: New parted version
From
: Joel Granados
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Lorenzo Villani
Re: Heads up: New parted version
From
: Joel Granados
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Andrew Haley
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Bryn M. Reeves
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Bryn M. Reeves
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Bryn M. Reeves
Re: Orphaning par2cmdline
From
: Erik van Pienbroek
Re: Orphaning par2cmdline
From
: Conrad Meyer
Orphaning par2cmdline
From
: Laurent Rineau
Re: Raising the bar
From
: kaboon
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: drago01
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Installing Fedora with software based synthesizer for sceenreader
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Bill McGonigle
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: King InuYasha
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Bill McGonigle
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Chris Adams
Re: FAO: Programmers Quick Q?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Rawhide pulseaudio manager problem
From
: Paul
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: King InuYasha
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: KSplice in Fedora?
From
: Christopher Brown
KSplice in Fedora?
From
: King InuYasha
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: drago01
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: Raising the bar
From
: nodata
Re: Raising the bar
From
: William Jon McCann
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Richard June
Re: Raising the bar
From
: William Jon McCann
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Mat Booth
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Darryl L. Pierce
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Casey Dahlin
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: drago01
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Raising the bar
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Ben Boeckel
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Ben Boeckel
Raising the bar
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Tom Lane
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: FAO: Programmers Quick Q?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Thomas Bendler
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: David
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: drago01
License changed for hightlight
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Mat Booth
Re: Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: FAO: Programmers Quick Q?
From
: Mat Booth
Re: Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: R P Herrold
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: FAO: Programmers Quick Q?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Chris Adams
Re: FAO: Programmers Quick Q?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Heads Up: e2fsprogs library split-out
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Rahul Sundaram
FAO: Programmers Quick Q?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Chris Weyl
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: drago01
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: drago01
rawhide report: 20090629 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: What decides that a package is multilib?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Dariusz J. Garbowski
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Cliff Nadler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: What decides that a package is multilib?
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Clyde E. Kunkel
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Clyde E. Kunkel
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Guido Grazioli
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: What decides that a package is multilib?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: What decides that a package is multilib?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Niels Haase
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Chris Adams
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: drago01
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Eric Springer
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: Streaming terminal output to a file
From
: Adam Huffman
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Michal Hlavinka
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
RELEASE: Mach 0.9.5 'MMM...'
From
: thomas
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Naheem Zaffar
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Niels Haase
Re: Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: Niels Haase
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Michal Hlavinka
Suggestion re FESCO Ticket #170
From
: David
Re: What decides that a package is multilib?
From
: Mary Ellen Foster
Re: What decides that a package is multilib?
From
: Ondřej Vašík
Re: Rawhide pulseaudio manager problem
From
: Julian Sikorski
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Jonathan Underwood
Re: What decides that a package is multilib?
From
: Marcela Maslanova
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Frank Murphy
What decides that a package is multilib?
From
: Mary Ellen Foster
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: King InuYasha
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Fabian Deutsch
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Eric Springer
http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: State of sound in Linux not so sorry after all
From
: Valent Turkovic
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: How user could loose his "CLA done" status?
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: REMINDER: End of life of Fedora 9
From
: Jens Petersen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Ricky Zhou
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Chris Adams
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Neil Thompson
Re: Rawhide pulseaudio manager problem
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Dave Airlie
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Rawhide pulseaudio manager problem
From
: Julian Sikorski
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Julian Aloofi
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: D. Stolte
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: drago01
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Julian Aloofi
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Ricky Zhou
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Streaming terminal output to a file
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Dariusz J. Garbowski
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Stephen John Smoogen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Christopher Stone
Re: How user could loose his "CLA done" status?
From
: Till Maas
Re: xterm terminfo spec change in ncurses
From
: Benny Amorsen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Rawhide pulseaudio manager problem
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Naheem Zaffar
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Christopher Stone
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes
From
: Björn Persson
Re: How user could loose his "CLA done" status?
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Julian Aloofi
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Julian Aloofi
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: drago01
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
rawhide report: 20090628 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Streaming terminal output to a file
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Niels Haase
Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Niels Haase
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Streaming terminal output to a file
From
: Paul
Fwd: [smc-discuss] Re: Fwd: Terminal emulator supporting Indic scripts like {kn, hi, pa}_IN.utf-8
From
: Rajeesh K Nambiar
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: OpenFWWF and Fedora (please look at the review request...)
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes
From
: Eric Springer
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Christopher Stone
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Christopher Stone
Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: rawhide report: 20090627 changes
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: drago01
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Jindrich Novy
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: drago01
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: drago01
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Niels Haase
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Matej Cepl
Re: Building firefox
From
: Edwin ten Brink
Re: Building firefox
From
: Paul
Re: Building firefox
From
: Ricky Zhou
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: OpenFWWF and Fedora (please look at the review request...)
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: José Matos
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Rawhide debuginfo packages with no sources
From
: Mat Booth
Rawhide pulseaudio manager problem
From
: Paul
Building firefox
From
: Paul
TeX Live 2008 available for testing
From
: Jindrich Novy
rawhide report: 20090627 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?! (BZ #508445)
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Panu Matilainen
OpenFWWF and Fedora (please look at the review request...)
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Stephen John Smoogen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Stephen John Smoogen
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: inode0
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Colin Walters
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Guido Grazioli
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Ian Weller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Guido Grazioli
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: John5342
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Odd omission for qt4-devel package
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: xterm terminfo spec change in ncurses
From
: Miroslav Lichvar
Re: Odd omission for qt4-devel package
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: doubt regarding package name
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: xterm terminfo spec change in ncurses
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: doubt regarding package name
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: xterm terminfo spec change in ncurses
From
: Miroslav Lichvar
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: Odd omission for qt4-devel package
From
: King InuYasha
xterm terminfo spec change in ncurses
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: rawhide report: 20090626 changes
From
: Benjamin Kosnik
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Chris Weyl
FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Chris Weyl
Re: Pidgin Issue, F11 64bit
From
: David
Re: Pidgin Issue, F11 64bit
From
: Aly Dharshi
Re: Pidgin Issue, F11 64bit
From
: David
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Iain Arnell
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Joe Nall
Re: evolution+openchange crash
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Joe Nall
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Joe Nall
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Joe Nall
Pidgin Issue, F11 64bit
From
: Aly Dharshi
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Pidgin Issue, F11 64bit
From
: Aly Dharshi
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Joe Nall
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Seth Vidal
yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!
From
: Roberto Ragusa
rawhide report: 20090626 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: Odd omission for qt4-devel package
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Simon Andrews
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Stephen Gallagher
Re: [JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Panu Matilainen
[JANITOR] Duplicate directory ownership cleanups
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Odd omission for qt4-devel package
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Terminal emulator supporting Indic scripts like {kn, hi, pa}_IN.utf-8
From
: Rajeesh K Nambiar
Odd omission for qt4-devel package
From
: King InuYasha
Re: evolution+openchange crash
From
: Milan Crha
Re: more debugging enabled in rawhide kernels.
From
: Clemens Eisserer
Plan for tomorrow's (20090626) FESCo meeting
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: more debugging enabled in rawhide kernels.
From
: Dave Jones
Re: doubt regarding package name
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: doubt regarding package name
From
: Fernando Nasser
Re: (A)synchronous file operations & xdg-open
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: doubt regarding package name
From
: Ville Skyttä
evolution+openchange crash
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: doubt regarding package name
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: more debugging enabled in rawhide kernels.
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
(A)synchronous file operations & xdg-open
From
: Jerry James
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Mary Ellen Foster
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Clemens Eisserer
Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: more debugging enabled in rawhide kernels.
From
: Dave Jones
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: doubt regarding package name
From
: Fernando Nasser
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Chris Adams
rawhide report: 20090625 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Simon Andrews
Re: software raid devices automatically getting checked ?
From
: Mogens Kjaer
software raid devices automatically getting checked ?
From
: Thomas Vander Stichele
Re: beagle
From
: SmootherFrOgZ
beagle
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Simon Andrews
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Martin Langhoff
Re: Terminal emulator supporting Indic scripts like {kn, hi, pa}_IN.utf-8
From
: Rajeesh K Nambiar
Re: doubt regarding package name
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Thunderbird/Evolution quirks
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: more debugging enabled in rawhide kernels.
From
: Warren Togami
Re: Terminal emulator supporting Indic scripts like {kn, hi, pa}_IN.utf-8
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: doubt regarding package name
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Kevin Kofler
more debugging enabled in rawhide kernels.
From
: Dave Jones
Re: Thunderbird/Evolution quirks
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Thunderbird/Evolution quirks
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Tom
Re: Thunderbird/Evolution quirks
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Thunderbird/Evolution quirks
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Björn Persson
Re: update mechanism for new releases
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Bill McGonigle
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Fedora 11 wireless-tools yum erase?
From
: Matthew Woehlke
Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Alexander Boström
RE: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?
From
: Avery, David [DENTK]
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
