Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> What may work is an anaconda mode that does not look up for network
> updates and runs yum in --skip-broken mode (and --skip-broken to be
> improved, right now there are still some cases where it gives up when
> some uprades would have been possible)

Then the F10+updates -> F11 upgrade will be mostly a no-op (e.g. the F10 KDE
requires the old openssl which prevents upgrading almost everything
else). --skip-broken is not a magic bullet, if everything's broken, it
won't do much good.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux