Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Simon Andrews wrote:
> Surely these aren't the kind of updates which should be applied within a
> release cycle anyway?  A new release is the time you'd expect to get a
> major revision of this sort.

Any KDE update can require kconf_update scripts, even bugfix releases (and
we also push the minor feature releases). The Firefox profile issue is
known to affect bookmarks between 3.5 beta and RC: the beta can't read the
bookmarks from the RC. I'm sure it'll get upgraded to the final release in
an update. And so on.

> 1) All of our servers have to access the internet via a proxy.  At least
> within the Anaconda UI there doesn't appear to be any support for
> configuring proxies so I'm forced into kickstart / shells / extra boot
> options to upgrade?

You can use preupgrade. It'll fetch the updates before booting into
Anaconda.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux