-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Lane wrote: > Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> Any chance that in the interim, e2fsprogs-devel could Require: these >>> new split out packages (if it doesn't already)? > >> For now it only requires libcom_err-devel, from inspection it looks like >> that's the only set of headers that the e2fsprogs-devel headers include ... > >> I could do this though - but when would it get removed again; would it >> be better to go with the short sharp shock and just clean it up in the >> early phase of F12? :) > > +1 for just do it. There is not a whole lot of point to refactoring the > package if dependent packages don't pick up the refactoring. > > AFAIR, the only reason postgresql BR's this is because libcom_err is > depended on by krb5, which it uses. I wonder whether the separate BR is > still needed at all --- shouldn't a BR on krb5-devel be sufficient? > > regards, tom lane > If not, it's a packaging error in krb5. - --Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpJGMUACgkQiPi+MRHG3qRcWACfV2ExmFoKzKbWTrdh/AhHCrmV HmYAoJxYKq/g6LhDDo+BZCchp3Fa0/Wm =jEo9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
