On Monday 29 June 2009 06:47:32 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/28/2009 06:51 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> The difference between features like a desktop globe and things like > >> NetworkManager is obvious. > > > > I know NM is important, and in fact that's why we have been shipping the > > mature NM-gnome in KDE spins so far, and it does work fine in KDE. And > > chances are good for the native NM plasmoid to be ready to be the default > > for F12. It's already available as an option. > > nm-applet doesn't work the KDE Wallet for example. This is exactly what > I mean by lack of integration. Yes, it's lack in free desktops integration! But these comment sound like a hope for a bright future: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16581#c9. It's important even for non Gnome/KDE applications like Arora. I don't think "free desktop" should be about competition (yes, we need some competition to move development forward) but about collaboration! Freedesktop.org is a great place for it. Jaroslav > > > And how is this relevant to the user? The user cares about what features > > they're getting, not who has written the code for them. > > It is relevant from the Fedora perspective. > > >> KDE does lack integration with them. > > > > That word doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. > > I understand perfectly well what it means. It's just that you aren't > willing to accept that they are integration gaps. > > Rahul > > Rahul -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
