Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/28/2009 06:51 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> The difference between features like a desktop globe and things like
>> NetworkManager is obvious.
> 
> I know NM is important, and in fact that's why we have been shipping the
> mature NM-gnome in KDE spins so far, and it does work fine in KDE. And
> chances are good for the native NM plasmoid to be ready to be the default
> for F12. It's already available as an option.

nm-applet doesn't work the KDE Wallet for example. This is exactly what
I mean by lack of integration.

> And how is this relevant to the user? The user cares about what features
> they're getting, not who has written the code for them.

It is relevant from the Fedora perspective.

>> KDE does lack integration with them.
> 
> That word doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.

I understand perfectly well what it means. It's just that you aren't
willing to accept that they are integration gaps.

Rahul

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux