On 06/28/2009 06:51 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> The difference between features like a desktop globe and things like >> NetworkManager is obvious. > > I know NM is important, and in fact that's why we have been shipping the > mature NM-gnome in KDE spins so far, and it does work fine in KDE. And > chances are good for the native NM plasmoid to be ready to be the default > for F12. It's already available as an option. nm-applet doesn't work the KDE Wallet for example. This is exactly what I mean by lack of integration. > And how is this relevant to the user? The user cares about what features > they're getting, not who has written the code for them. It is relevant from the Fedora perspective. >> KDE does lack integration with them. > > That word doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. I understand perfectly well what it means. It's just that you aren't willing to accept that they are integration gaps. Rahul Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list